i usually go by the dittman factor…
if you see a movie that uses primarily earl dittman of wireless magazine’s reviews in its advertising, you know to avoid it…
When I watched the preview, no one laughed. Not a snort. Not a giggle, titter or chuckle. With a preview that unfunny, I knew it was going to be bad. But this seems to have found a new, undiscovered zone of bad. Have I seen it? No. Never. As in, never. Jamie Kennedy, with this film, might just become a major box office anti-draw (repulse?). He was well on his way anyway.
Jamie Kennedy
Those two words should be the death-knell of any movie these days.
Damien
CGI people scare me
are you kidding me, i can tell this movie will be bad just by the previews! CGI babies scare me. make it stop! :(
I have a gauge
I have a really good friend, with really bad taste in movies. Or at least what she likes, I typically dislike, and vice versa.
In a word, she loved it.
i usually go by the dittman factor…
if you see a movie that uses primarily earl dittman of wireless magazine’s reviews in its advertising, you know to avoid it…
here’s a little info on dittman: http://www.efilmcritic.com/feature.php?feature=712
About Jamie Kennedy
I beleve that Jamie Kennedy is the new Paulie Shore.
Re: About Jamie Kennedy
Son of The Weasel?
Quite possibly…
…one of the most brutal reviews ever.
Re: Quite possibly…
When I watched the preview, no one laughed. Not a snort. Not a giggle, titter or chuckle. With a preview that unfunny, I knew it was going to be bad. But this seems to have found a new, undiscovered zone of bad. Have I seen it? No. Never. As in, never. Jamie Kennedy, with this film, might just become a major box office anti-draw (repulse?). He was well on his way anyway.