Today’s double feature: the Back to the

Cast, Crew, and Other Info

Michael J. Fox
plays Marty
Christopher Lloyd plays “Doc” Brown.

Lea Thompson plays
Thomas F. Wilson plays Biff Tannen.

Marc “Jimmy
Olsen” McClure plays Dave McFly.

Written by
Bob Gale and
Robert Zemeckis
Directed by Robert Zemeckis

information is available from the

in a complete trilogy package. (The movies are not

Past movie reviews can be
found here.


Marty McFly travels to the future to correct problems
with his
children. While there, he accidentally starts a chain
of events that
forces him to go back to 1955 in order to maintain the
latest version
of 1985 (which he and Doc Brown consider the correct
version, even
though it’s the one that Marty made by messing with
history during the
first movie.)

High Point

The mechanics of inserting scenes into the first

Low Point

SPOILER: If time travel works the way it was described
in the film,
Old Biff couldn’t have returned to
the 2015 that
Marty and Doc were in. Instead, he’d have taken the
Delorian back to
the new 2015 and stranded Marty and Doc in the new one
until the time
line corrected itself, at which point they’d have had
to hunt for the
time machine in 2015, done the research there, and
then gone back to

The Scores

This sequel isn’t as original as the previous
entry in the
series. It’s a collection of all the classic time
travel paradox
discussions cobbled together. I give it 3 out of 6.

The effects had the occassional visible matte
lines, but in
general, they were very well done for 1989. Many of
the interactions,
particularly around the McFly dinner table, and still
impressive. I give it 5 out of 6.

The story has no big, cohesive idea. The
goals for the
characters change every 30-40 minutes, with a hunt
sequence that feels
expanded to fill time. It really feels like the
writers knew where #1
ended and where they wanted #3 to begin, and threw
together any old
concoction that bridged the gap. Some scenes felt
like they were just
toying with the technical fun you get from inserting a
new action
sequence into an existing film, and they forgot about
making it fun
for the non-film geeks in the audience. I give it 3
out of 6.

The acting isn’t as good as the original or
the next sequel,
which is odd given that this and the third were filmed
The principal actors were all over the top, and
Elisabeth Shue isn’t
nearly as good as she is in her later works. It’s
almost like they
were told to ham it up just for this one to compensate
for a weak
script, but that just introduced inconsistencies in
portrayal that
stand out for the audience. I give it 4 out of 6.

Th emotional response is weaker here than for
the others.
It’s not as funny as the other two, and the lack of
clear direction
makes it hard to get engaged in the plot. I give it 3
out of 6.

The production is extremely difficult for
this. There are a
number of sets and costumes that need to be designed
from scratch, and
there is the raw challenge of shooting “around” the
action of the
first film with new footage. My only complaint is
that effects
technology of the time restricted some of the camera
angles enough to
detract from the presentation. I give it 5 out of 6.

Overall, this chapter is necessary to get
from the first to
the third, but it doesn’t hold up on its own. See it
only as part of
the complete package. I give it 3 out of 6.

In total, Back to the Future: Part II
receives 26 out of 42.