MGM tried a live action family film in 1968, that
prevented Dick van Dyke from working for Disney for
Cast, Crew, and Other Info
Dick Van Dyke as Caractacus Potts
Sally Ann Howes as Truly Scrumptious
Lionel Jeffries as Grandpa Potts
Gert Frobe as Baron Bomburst
Anna Quayle as Baroness Bomburst
Benny Hill as Toymaker
Heather Ripley as Jemima
Adrian Hall as Jeremy
Screenplay written by Roald Dahl and Ken Hughes, based
on an Ian
Directed by Ken Hughes.
Complete information is available from the
Past movie reviews can be found here.
The first half is about an inventor who wants to raise
the money to
buy an old wreck of a car his children like to play
in. The second
half, they sit in the car and make stuff up.
The automatic hair cut machine. Predictable, yes, but
They had a decent story that they dove into quickly,
and then spent
over an hour telling. So far, so good. Then, it’s as
if they didn’t
know what to do next, so they concocted a completely
for the second half and just stuck them together. (I
haven’t read the
novel, but based on Amazon.com comments, it tells a
that brings the fantastical elements into the “real
life” part of the
This is a somewhat original story. The look
and feel were
the standard of 1960s musicals, but this one feels a
natural. There are songs sung by an eccentric family,
and only two
big group dance numbers, one of which involves a dance
troup, so it
doesn’t seem so out of place. I give it 4 out of 6.
The effects had a lot of significant colour
foreground and background, but otherwise worked fairly
well. (Back in
1968, you pretty much had to build what you were
trying to shoot.) I
give it 4 out of 6.
The story has two well written but completely
components. This disconnection is the biggest issue
with the film.
I give it 4 out of 6.
The acting is 1960s movie musical acting.
lots of smiling faces, and so forth. I give it 4 out
The emotional response is weak for me. I
pieces of the movie as a child, but never sitting
through the entire
thing. (That was odd for me even then; I saw my first
movie at age 13
months, and I’m told I didn’t take my eyes off the
screen at any
time.) Seeing it again now, I understand why. There
are a number of
very slow parts, and children’s entertainment is now
done at a much
faster pace. Don’t be surprised if this is less
popular with children
today than it was in 1968. Watching it now, the
awkwardness of the
two stories is quite clear. I give it 3 out of 6.
The production was very well done, with great
production design and some difficult helicopter shots.
I give it 5
out of 6.
Overall, it’s a couple of good but distinct
together. I give it 3 out of 6.
In total, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang receives 27
out of 42.