One of the true classics gets its long overdue review
Cast, Crew, and Other Info
Michael Rennie as Klaatu
Patricia Neal as Helen Benson
Hugh Marlowe as Tom Stevens
Sam Jaffe as Prof. Bernhardt
Billy Gray as Bobby Benson
Frances Bavier as Mrs. Barley
Lock Martin as Gort
Screenplay by Edmund H. North, based on a story by
Directed by Robert Wise
Complete information is available from the
Past movie reviews can be found here.
A spacecraft arrives on Earth, and human paranoia
makes it difficult
for its passenger to deliver a simple message.
Klaatu visits Arlington. It’s a different perspective on that location than we normally see on film, and one that really drives the message home.
The disturbing plausibility of the human reaction. This is the most depressing and unenjoyable aspect of watching the film. Unlike most low points in our reviews, it’s not hard to watch because the filmmakers exercised poor judgement, but because the film got it right.
There were a glut of “Earth is doomed!” movies from this era. This was one of the first, and certainly the best of those I’ve seen, though. It feels original, by telling a story with a powerful message without actually getting preachy. (Well, the last couple of minutes feel preachy, but it was time to be blunt, so that’s acceptable given the way the story played out.) I give it 4 out of 6.
The effects were pretty good for the era.
has transparency issues, mostly likely due to double
techniques, but otherwise it works well. The only
other issue was the
obvious presence of the wires when Mrs. Benson is
(These aren’t piano wires, these are thick cables,
likely scrounged on
set that day when they realized the actor wasn’t as
strong as they’d
thought.) Those problems are blatant, though,
especially the latter.
I give it 4 out of 6.
The story was obviously regarded by the
filmmakers as the
most important piece of the film. It’s imperative
that the audience
understands Klaatu’s nature, and we do. We see the
world through his
eyes, which gives us a different perspective on things
normally have. The plausibility of the reactions of
the characters in
the film drive the message home better than any speech
have made. I give it 6 out of 6.
The acting was very well done, only
overplayed slightly in
the “scream queen” scene. These people played their
and brought the film together. Even the child actor
did a good job.
I give it 5 out of 6.
The emotional response is excellent, even
viewings. We genuinely like the likeable characters,
and have a
distaste for those that make choices the filmmakers
of. There’s tension in the chase sequences, and an
of forboding afterwards. Very well made. I give it 6
out of 6.
The production drove the emotional response.
Wise filmed the
characters we shouldn’t identify with from different
angles than the
stars. For example, when Helen and Tom are arguing
before they know his true nature, the angle puts
Helen’s face on film,
while we can see only the back of Tom’s head. Without
eye contact, we
don’t trust or identify with the character, and
naturally take Helen’s
side. This kind of attention to detail pervades the
film, right down
to care in the lighting and editing process. (The
editing should be
no surprise; the director of this film served as
editor on Citizen
Kane.) I give it 6 out of 6.
Overall, this movie is a great film, whether
you’re a genre
fan or not. See it. I give it 6 out of 6.
In total, The Day The Earth Stood Still
receives 37 out of 42.
Join us next week for a review of E.T.. With
a week of vacation, I should have time to compare the
original and rerelease versions.