The third “brainwashing” film in our Saturday review
run (after A Clockwork
Orange
and Conspiracy
Theory
) is reviewed today.

Cast, Crew, and Other Info

Frank Sinatra as Bennet Marco

Laurence Harvey as Raymond Shaw

Janet Leigh as Eugenie Rose Chaney

Angela Lansbury as Mrs. Iselin

Henry Silva as Chunjin

Screenplay by George Axelrod, based on a Richard
Condon novel

Directed by John Frankenheimer

Complete information is available from the
IMDB
.

Buy from: Amazon.com
or Amazon.ca

Past movie reviews can be found here.

Premise

Soldiers kidnapped during the Korean War may not be
remembering things
exactly as they happened.

High Point

The drinking buddies who never got along.

Low Point

The sudden onset of love. Neither romance was really
effective, but
the Sinatra/Leigh romance was right over the top. All
she knew about
him was that he was so messed up he couldn’t light a
cigarette, and
yet she gave him her complete life story, phone number
and home
address, just before she broke up with her current
fiance.

The Scores

The originality is pretty good, as this was
the first major
reprogramming film since The Cabinet
of
Dr. Caligari
. (Even that is a very loose
comparison.) If it
weren’t an adaptation, it would be nearly perfect in
this category. I
give it 5 out of 6.

The effect is singular, since the only one
they needed was
filming a television screen. It wasn’t done well, but
I seriously
doubt that’ll have any significant impact on how well
you enjoy the
film, as it was so minor. I give it 3 out of 6.

The story was well written, with quite a bit
of tension. The
romantic angles were the only portions that didn’t
work, but they
weren’t significant enough to be a major problem. I
give it 5 out of
6.

The acting was well done across the board.
Everyone turns in
good performances, particularly Lansbury (who was
nominated for an
Oscar for this role) and Harvey. I give it 6 out of
6.

The emotional response was strong. I felt a
lot of tension,
even though I’d already seen the recent remake (which
was also quite
good, though in a different way.) I knew the plan and
the identity of
the American agent, but it still held my attention as
it played out.
The conclusion was also quite effective, and would
have been even more
effective when it was released in 1962. I give it 5
out of 6.

The production was well done, with some very
effective use of
close-ups. The pacing is somewhat slow by today’s
standards, but
that’s not a serious problem. I give it 5 out of 6.

Overall, it’s a good suspence film, set
deeply in the 1960s
political climate. I give it 5 out of 6.

In total, the original Manchurian Candidate
receives 34 out
of 42.

Next Week

Next week’s review will be of Mars Attacks!.
After that will follow reviews of The Matrix
and Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc.